dobbie wrote:1 - First I have to rant it’s spooky that the video takes fifteen minutes for an exegesis on a brief Bible passage. It’s a red flag to me.
DiVotex wrote: What does it matter how long an argument is?
sepia wrote:2) Maybe we will use the same strategy against creationist. Just think about the "miracles" in the bible or the quran. It would be double standard to ignore it in this case.
dobbie wrote:In this case it's fifteen minutes on two short Bible verses. I rant here that it's almost always the case that such length will contain too much unnecessary stuff or some kind of "technical" argument, which somebody else can refute in two minutes. And sure enough that is what happened as far as I'm concerned about it.
DiVortex wrote: If I understand correctly, your complaint is simply that he could have been more brief and present a more compact argument, but he made his presentation needlessly long. That might be so, but I don't see how that's a point against what he's saying.
DiVortex wrote: I don't think skeptics should be spouting so carelessly "women are forced to marry their rapists" because it's not that self-evident at all.
DjVortex wrote:I don't understand what you mean. Could you elaborate?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest